Elon Musk's Space X Video Of Earth's Flat Edge

By Lee Austin

 As detailed in my book “Morning Star’s Tale” Amazon.com: Morning Star’s Tale: 9798619133080: Austin, Lee: Books he earth is flat.  

Forward to the 18:21 minute mark of the attached video Intelsat G-31/G-32 Mission – YouTube and observe the straight edge of the flat earth without a fisheye lens.  A couple of seconds later Space X reverts back to the camera with the fisheye lens and a curved earth is displayed.  So which camera is accurate?  

 It’s not the high-def digital clarity that holds the key to deception. Rather it’s the lens of perception through which your eyes view the temporal reality. In this case, the cameras lens brings the lie into focus. There’s no denying that videos taken from above distinctly show the earth’s curvature. However, the only curvature is in the fisheye lens of the camera. It’s not the earth that has curvature. But the lens itself creating the illusion of curvature. Like a mirage rising off a desert highway in middle of the summer. These ultra wide angle lenses produce a strong visual distortion. All the while creating a wide panoramic hemispherical image, like when a fish eye lens is tilted up or down in relation to the horizon. The result is the illusion of curvature. Tilting it down creates an orb curved effect. Panning the shot from a low orbit position above to the flat earth below displays the mirage of an orb curved effect. 

We’ve been programmed to believe you live on a magical, rotating ball with a circumference of twenty-four thousand nine hundred and one miles.  

Let’s examine the flight path from Frankfurt Germany to Montreal and San Jose. Frankfurt is located at a latitude 50.11 degrees North, Montreal 45.50 and San Jose at 37.33. On a ball earth if the shortest distance between two points is a straight line then logically the shortest, fastest and most economical flight route from Frankfurt to Montreal and San Jose is in a Southwesterly direction. However, the flight route to San Jose makes absolutely no sense. Why would a flight departing Frankfurt fly in a Northwesterly direction and then cruise along the Arctic Circle before changing course to the Southwest? Completely illogical unless the stated flight path is a deception. As a matter of fact the flight track passes near Greenland’s largest city Nuuk, at a latitude 64.18 degrees North. So a jet departing from a latitude of 50.11 degrees travels approximately 14 degrees Northwest before heading Southwest to its final destination at 37.33 degrees latitude. Does that make any sense?… At all? 

It does when you re-examine the flight path on a flat earth map. I recommend referencing Gleason’s “New Standard Map Of The World.”  The Frankfurt to San Jose route on Gleason’s flat earth is a straight line from Frankfurt to San Jose passing directly over Greenland.  In contrast the official bell curve flight path on the ball earth is a fictional deception. Because San Jose is 2521 miles West of Montreal, the shortest distance from Frankfurt to San Jose is in a Northwestern Direction. In other words on the flat earth map San Jose is on the opposite side of Frankfurt.  

 If earth was a ball jets would have to compensate for the curvature with a constant downward trajectory or they would crash into water firmament dome. In truth jets fly level to the ground because there isn’t any curvature. 

The artificial horizon instrument in the cockpit of a jet indicates whether the pilot is flying level to the horizon. This gauge is a mechanical gyroscope without a single internal electrical component, adjusting itself into an upright position indicating a level flight in relation to the ground. Therefore if a jet followed the true curvature of the fictional earth ball the artificial horizon should roll back to reflect curvature. It doesn’t. The constant flat line on the artificial horizon instrument proves the horizon is always flat. In addition the sundial, periscope, and lighthouse could not function on a round spinning ball. 

The brainwashing began in kindergarten, focusing our innocent, impressionable eyes on the ubiquitous, fictional ball. So thorough was our brainwashing we believe a magical, invisible force called gravity makes the oceans, buildings and people stick to the fictional round ball, all the while spinning faster than the speed of sound. Gravity is why people in Australia don’t fall off the earth. 

Gravity doesn’t exist. Rather it’s a question of density. If its lighter than air, it rises. If it’s heavier than air, it falls. A helium balloon rises because it’s lighter than the atmosphere. Those who adhere to the illusion of gravity believe it’s powerful enough to conform the oceans to the planet, and simultaneously weak enough for a butterfly to stay aloft. Gravity must be believed, or the spinning ball heliocentric model …. wait for it…. falls flat.  

Through the lens of a telescope the stars and planets appear to have ripples; a natural occurrence, since my stones of fire are encased within the sea firmament dome. The sun and moon don’t display water ripples because they are below the water firmament dome, rotating clockwise above and around the flat earth, confined within the third dimension of the first heaven.  

Rockets always curve after liftoff, avoiding a crash into the water firmament dome thirty five hundred miles above the surface of my flat earth. In truth, outer space doesn’t exist. No astronaut has ever penetrated the sea firmament dome, also deceptively known as the Van Allen Belt.