The Pelosi Incident

I can’t resist adding my two cents about this mysterious attack upon House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband, just days before the midterm elections. I’ll list some questions I have that are as yet unanswered, some of which weren’t even asked yet, so far as I know.

So much does not add up.

Nancy Pelosi is second in line to the presidency. After all the screaming and hollering about potential threats on Democrat politicians’ lives, are we to believe that there’s no security system at her home whatsoever? No burglar alarm that went off during this “burglary” aka “home invasion?”

If there is a security system, was it set? If not, why not? It was 2:27 a.m. when the police were called by Paul Pelosi.

The Pelosis, with all their money, haven’t hired 24/7 security guards? If not, why not? If so, where were they?

The elderly Pelosis, with all their money, with their large house, had no housekeeping or other staff present in the home?

Who was the mysterious person who let the police into the home that night, after police were dispatched for a “well-being check?” (Note: Not for a home invasion. Not for a burglary. For a well-being check.)

Did the police know/recognize that this was Nancy Pelosi’s home to which they were responding?

Or was Paul Pelosi alone in the home (other than for the “burglar”)? With Nancy Pelosi in DC, are we to believe that her elderly husband, only recently involved in that unfortunate DUI incident, was alone in that big house, with no security?

Was the alleged intruder in his underwear or wasn’t he? What was Paul Pelosi wearing at the time?

Why would a burglar, intent upon theft or assault and having already been found out by the resident, allow the homeowner to go to the bathroom, where he was allegedly charging his cell phone, which he then used to call the police?

Did Paul Pelosi speak to the dispatcher or not? Some stories have said that he was simply overheard by the dispatcher, speaking “in code” so the dispatcher would deduce that he wanted help. If he didn’t speak to the dispatcher, then why was he referred to by the police as the RP, the “reporting person?”

This is a biggie: Who is the “witness” who claimed to have heard the alleged intruder ask the same question that, allegedly, on Jan. 6, “insurrectionists” were crying out in the Capitol: “Where’s Nancy?”

Who exactly claims this? News stories to a one report this as fact, but who was the “witness” who heard it? Was it Paul Pelosi?

Was it someone invested in promoting a Democrat narrative to blame Trump, MAGA supporters, and Republicans for this attack?

Upon what basis does story after story repeat this allegation without any evidence? It’s important, isn’t it, for the public to know who’s making such a claim so that the people, just days before an election, can judge the credibility of the claim?

The only “evidence” that could be proffered here, short of an admission by the alleged perpetrator, would be audio of the outcry or at the very least the name of the person who “witnessed” the outcry. Absent a named witness, there’s no evidence, so such an incendiary allegation shouldn’t be made until verified.

Did the police hear this? If so, then is it in the police report? Is the person who “witnessed” the assailant crying out, “Where’s Nancy?” ever going to be named?

Was there a police report made? Has it been released? If not, why not?

Why did the police stand by and watch Paul Pelosi get beaten with a hammer? If the men were fighting over control of the hammer–a weapon–why wouldn’t the police intervene? Did they pull their weapons and order the men to drop the hammer?

It’s said that the alleged intruder entered uninvited through broken glass doors. Photos were published showing broken windows, where the intruder allegedly made his way in. But why is there broken glass outside, on the brick walkway, if the windows were broken from outside? Wouldn’t the broken glass be on the inside? Doesn’t it seem more likely that these windows were broken from the inside, perhaps during the struggle? Who broke the windows?

Don’t the Pelosis have surveillance cameras, especially given that they live in an urban area? Was this intrusion caught on camera? If so, then why not release the video?

Did the police wear body cameras? If so, why not release the video? We the People need to know exactly what happened in the home of the person who is second in line for the presidency, especially because the whole incident has become a political issue, which it would not have been had the Democrats and Joe Biden not deliberately injected politics into the situation.

The police dispatcher said that Paul Pelosi referred to the intruder as “a friend.” Was he, then, a burglar? Did he break in or did Paul Pelosi let him in, because he was a friend? Did Paul Pelosi then ask him to leave, but he refused?

Are the police looking into Paul Pelosi’s whereabouts earlier in the evening? Are they examining his phone calls? In other words, might he have known the alleged burglar was coming over?

Consider that police are charging the alleged intruder with elder abuse, a charge usually lodged against someone who’s a caregiver for an elderly person. Was the alleged intruder, this “friend,” someone who was tasked with watching over Paul Pelosi in his wife’s absence? Could that explain why the alleged intruder was in his underwear at 2:27 a.m.? Could that explain why the police went there for a “well being” check, not for a burglary or home invasion, and perhaps proceeded as if this were a domestic dispute and not a crime (until the alleged assault)?

Why was the alleged intruder taken to the hospital, too? When will he be released? What are his injuries and how were they acquired? When will he be arraigned?

Why do the mainstream media all report what was written on blogs, attributing the (racist, bigoted, delusional, misguided, anti-semitic, etc.) comments to David DePape, the alleged intruder, when these blogs and social media posts have not been definitively proven to have been written by or connected to DePape?

(Do some research and you will find that most of these alleged writings are of very recent origin. Why is that? In addition, there are multiple people named David DePape in this world. Isn’t it incumbent upon a real journalist to first ensure that what they report as having been written by a person actually was written by that person and not, for example, by a troll or political operative?

As an example, there was a school shooting in St. Louis this past week. Reporters took and reported the testimony of at least two students who alleged that they had seen the shooter and that he was a white man. He was actually black, obviously black. These students either lied or were (unbelievably) mistaken, but in either case what they said should not have been reported until it had been verified, especially considering the state of race relations in St. Louis after Ferguson.)

A few more questions about the Pelosi incident:

If the Capitol Police and the FBI have taken over the investigation, does that mean that they’re going to button up/control all information about this incident, as they have with the Jan. 6 investigation, the death of Ashli Babbitt, and the Seth Rich case, so that the public will probably never learn the truth? Is that why they’re now involved?

Do the stories change because they’re making it up as they go along? Obviously, after the DUI incident involving Mr. Pelosi, a 911 call to the police from his home would not have gone unnoticed. Whatever happened here, it’s not hard to speculate that a narrative had to be created to cast the best light possible on the Pelosis.

What better way to distract from the truth than to blame Trump and the Republicans?

Never let a crisis go to waste.

(I’ll add links to sources of information tomorrow, either in the post or in comments below.)

#####